A voluminous writer, was born in 1716, at Peterborough. He was brought up as an apothecary, and practised as a physician; wrote numerous books with great rapidity, and was the inventor of several quack medicines. Under the auspices of the Earl of Bute he published a “System of Botany,” in 17 vols. folio; and on presenting a copy of it to the king of Sweden was invested with the order of Vasa. He also published a Supplement to Chambers’ Cyclopædia, “Essays on Natural History and Philosophy;” conducted a periodical called “The Inspector,” and wrote several novels, farces, &c. He was a constant attendant at every place of public amusement; and, being a satirical “busybody,” was often involved in quarrels with the wits of the day.

—Cates, William L. R., 1867, ed., A Dictionary of General Biography, p. 513.    

1

Personal

With sleek appearance and with ambling pace,
And, type of vacant head, with vacant face,
The Proteus Hill put in his modest plea,—
Let Favour speak for others, Worth for me.—
For who, like him, his various powers could call
Into so many shapes and shine in all?
Who could so nobly grace the motley list,
Actor, Inspector, Doctor, Botanist?
Knows any one so well—sure no one knows—
At once to play, prescribe, compound, compose?
—Churchill, Charles, 1761, The Rosciad.    

2

  Dr. Hill was, notwithstanding, a very curious observer; and if he would have been contented to tell the world no more than he knew, he might have been a very considerable man, and needed not to have recourse to such mean expedients to raise his reputation.

—Johnson, Samuel, 1767, Conversation with George III., Life by Boswell, ed. Hill, vol. II, p. 44.    

3

  He had received no academical education; but his ambition prompting him to be a graduate, he obtained, from one of those universities which would scarce refuse a degree to an apothecary’s horse, a diploma for that of doctor of physic. After this, he engaged in a variety of works, the greater part whereof were mere compilations, which he sent forth with incredible expedition; and though his character was never in such estimation with the booksellers as to entitle him to an extraordinary price for his writings, he has been known by such works as those above mentioned, by novels, pamphlets, and a periodical paper called “The Inspector,” the labour of his own head and hand, to have earned, in one year, the sum of £1500. He was vain, conceited, and in his writings disposed to satire and licentious scurrility, which he indulged without any regard to truth, and thereby became engaged in frequent disputes and quarrels that always terminated in his own disgrace.

—Hawkins, Sir John, 1787, The Life of Samuel Johnson, p. 211.    

4

  The literary Proteus, Dr., afterwards Sir John Hill, who shared with Orator Henley the dubious honour of being the most notorious man of his age. Hill was originally an apothecary, but abandoning his business for the stage, he produced a few bad farces at the Haymarket, in which he appeared as an actor…. Having been hissed off the stage, he betook himself with industry to the study of medicine and natural history; and many works on these subjects, displaying considerable information and research, proceeded from his pen. As a consequence of his scientific labours, and armed with the cheap honours of a Scotch degree, he obtained a large practice as a physician, and was enabled to launch out into extravagances which increased his notoriety, and showed the shallowness of his character…. His activity and industry were indeed marvellous. Though he spent so much of his time in the amusements of the gay world, and in frequenting places of entertainment, his pen was never idle.

—Lawrence, Frederick, 1855, The Life of Henry Fielding, pp. 304, 305.    

5

  Hill was a versatile man of unscrupulous character, with considerable abilities, great perseverance, and unlimited impudence.

—Barker, G. F. Russell, 1891, Dictionary of National Biography, vol. XXVI, p. 398.    

6

General

See where my son, who gratefully repays
Whate’er I lavish’d on his younger days;
Whom still my arm protects to brave the town
Secure from Fielding, Machiavel, or Brown;
Whom rage nor sword e’er mortally shall hurt,
Chief of a hundred chiefs o’er all the pert!
Rescued an orphan babe from common sense,
I gave his mother’s milk to Confidence;
She with her own ambrosia bronz’d his face,
And changed his skin to monumental brass.
—Anon., 1752, The Pasquinade.    

7

The neutral nonsense, neither false nor true—
Should Jove himself, in calculation mad,
Still negatives to blank negations add;
How could the barren ciphers ever breed;
But nothing still from nothing would proceed.
Raise, or depress, or magnify, or blame
Inanity will ever be the same.
—Smart, Christopher, 1753, The Hilliad.    

8

For physics and farces,
His equal there scarce is;
His farces are physic,
His physic a farce is.
—Garrick, David, On Dr. Hill Farce.    

9

  Sir John Hill had just wrote a book of great elegance—I think it was called “Exotic Botany”—which he wished to have presented to the king, and therefore named it to Lord Bute. His lordship waived that, saying that “he had a greater object to propose;” and shortly after laid before him a plan of the most voluminous, magnificent, and costly work that ever man attempted. I tremble when I name its title—because I think the severe application which it required killed him; and I am sure the expense ruined his fortune—“The Vegetable System.” This work was to consist of twenty-six volumes folio, containing sixteen hundred copperplates, the engraving of each cost four guineas; the paper was of the most expensive kind; the drawings by the first hands. The printing was also a very weighty concern; and many other articles, with which I am unacquainted. Lord Bute said that “the expense had been considered, and that Sir John Hill might rest assured his circumstances should not be injured.” Thus he entered upon and finished his destruction. The sale bore no proportion to the expense. After “The Vegetable System” was completed, Lord Bute proposed another volume to be added, which Sir John strenuously opposed; but his lordship repeating his desire, Sir John complied, lest his lordship should find a pretext to cast aside repeated promises of ample provision for himself and family. But this was the crisis of his fate—he died.

—Hill, Hon. Lady, 1787, An Address to the Public.    

10

  One of the most extraordinary characters of the eighteenth century…. It cannot be denied, that, in many of these volumes, a considerable fund of information, especially on Botany, was communicated to the public; and though the mode in which it was conveyed was generally slovenly, and sometimes inaccurate and unscientific, our author must be allowed the merit of having greatly contributed to diffuse through the island a taste for natural history…. Under this form the “Inspector” includes one hundred and fifty-two numbers; many of which are written with vivacity, and a few exhibit traits of humour, character, and imagination. The most useful and interesting papers in the work are devoted to subjects of natural history, especially to microscopical observations on insects, fossils, &c. The style of this periodical paper, as might be expected from the hasty manner in which it was usually written, is often loose and slovenly, and frequently ungrammatical.

—Drake, Nathan, 1809, Essays Illustrative of the Rambler, Adventurer, and Idler, vol. II, pp. 238, 241, 245.    

11

  This despised man, after all the fertile absurdities of his literary life, performed more for the improvement of the “Philosophical Transactions,” and was the cause of diffusing a more general taste for the science of botany, than any other contemporary. His real ability extorts that regard which his misdirected ingenuity, instigated by vanity, and often by more worthless motives, had lost for him in the world.

—Disraeli, Isaac, 1814, Sir John Hill, Quarrels of Authors.    

12

  A detailed account of these many publications would be of but small interest to the modern reader, who knows little of Sir John save his name, and this principally through his quarrels with the Royal Society, and with Garrick. He was a man of remarkable versatility of talent, but his moral character cannot be commended.

—Allibone, S. Austin, 1854–58, Dictionary of English Literature, vol. I, p. 846.    

13