Born at Guildford, Surrey, Oct. 29, 1562: died at Croydon, Aug. 4, 1633. An English prelate, appointed archbishop of Canterbury in Feb., 1611. He was graduated at Oxford (Balliol College), where he was tutor until 1593, and became master of University College in 1597, dean of Winchester in 1600, vice-chancellor of Oxford University in 1600 (and again in 1603 and 1605), bishop of Coventry and Lichfield in May, 1609, and bishop of London in Feb., 1610. He was a firm Protestant, and was influential in state affairs during the reign of James I. He was one of the translators of the New Testament in the King James version.

—Smith, Benjamin E., 1894–97, ed., The Century Cyclopedia of Names, p. 2.    

1

  A grave man in his conversation, and unblamable in his life. Indeed, it is charged on him that non amavit gentem nostram, “he loved not our nation;” forsaking the birds of his own feather to fly with others, and generally favouring the laity above the clergy, in all cases brought before him. But this he endeavoured to excuse to a private friend, by protesting he was himself so severe to the clergy on purpose to rescue them from the severity of others, and to prevent the punishment of them from lay judges, to their greater shame. I also read in a nameless author, that towards his death he was not only discontented himself, but his house was the rendezvous of all malcontents in church and state; making midnight of noonday, by constant keeping of candles light in his chamber and study; as also such visitants as repaired unto him, called themselves Nicodemites, because of their secret addresses. But a credible person, and one of his nearest relations, knew nothing thereof; which, with me, much shaketh the probability of the report. And thus we leave the archbishop, and the rest of his praises, to be reported by the poor people of Guildford, in Surrey, where he founded and endowed a fair almshouse in the town of his nativity.

—Fuller, Thomas, 1655, The Church History of Britain, vol. III, bk. xi, par. 53–55, p. 350.    

2

  Archbishop Abbot was borne in the howse of old Flemish building, timber and brick, now an alehouse, the signe “Three Mariners,” by the river’s side by the bridge on the north side of the street in St. Nicholas parish on the right hand as you goe out of the towne northwards. Old Nightingale was his servant, and weepes when he talkes of him. Every one that knew, loved him. He was sometimes cholerique. He was borne the first howse over the bridge on the right hand in St. Nicholas parish (Guildford). He was the sonne of a sherman. His mother, with child of him, longed for a jack, and dream’t that if shee could eate a jack, her son should be a great man. The next morning, goeing to the river, which runs by the howse (which is by the bridge) with her payle to take up some water, a good jack came into her payle. Which shee eat up, all, her selfe. This is gener’lly received for a trueth.

—Aubrey, John, 1669–96, Brief Lives, ed. Clark, vol. I, p. 24.    

3

  He was also a learned man, and had his erudition all of the old stamp. The things that he hath written … shew him to be a man of parts, learning, vigilancy, and unwearied study, tho’ overwhelmed with business.

—Wood, Anthony, 1691–1721, Athenæ Oxonienses, vol. I, f. 584.    

4

  His character was of a negative, not to say neutral, cast. He was neither deficient in piety, morality, talents, or learning, but he exercised them only with a decency so cold and sober that it had an air even of selfishness. He was an example calculated for a village, not for a kingdom. In the spiritual concerns of his great office he was obstinate without zeal, and in the temporal haughty without dignity. His understanding, though strong, was of an order too coarse and mechanical to be applied to the niceties of state affairs, and an ungracious temper, together with a rough unbending honesty, rendered him almost a stranger to the Court. It is natural to ask how such a man could have arisen to the highest station within the reach of a subject?—Simply by good fortune.

—Lodge, Edmund, 1821–34, Portraits of Illustrious Personages of Great Britain, vol. III.    

5

  A sincere but narrow-minded Calvinist, he was equally opposed to Catholics and to heretics…. He was charitable, and far less obsequious to the kingly will than most of his compeers. His closing years were clouded by an accident, the shooting of a gamekeeper (1621); and during the last six he was almost superseded by Laud.

—Patrick and Groome, 1897, eds., Chambers’s Biographical Dictionary, p. 5.    

6